fix(diagrams): replace \n with <br/> in all Mermaid node labels
Mermaid does not support \n for line breaks — rendered literally. Replaced all 276 occurrences with <br/> across 10 diagram files. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
Florian BRUNIAUX
parent
92643c1a6b
commit
24b464802e
10 changed files with 276 additions and 276 deletions
|
|
@ -17,20 +17,20 @@ Three proven topologies for multi-agent coordination. Choose based on task indep
|
|||
```mermaid
|
||||
flowchart TD
|
||||
subgraph ORCH["Pattern 1: Orchestrator + Workers"]
|
||||
OL[Lead Orchestrator] --> OW1[Worker 1\nFrontend]
|
||||
OL --> OW2[Worker 2\nBackend]
|
||||
OL --> OW3[Worker 3\nTests]
|
||||
OL[Lead Orchestrator] --> OW1[Worker 1<br/>Frontend]
|
||||
OL --> OW2[Worker 2<br/>Backend]
|
||||
OL --> OW3[Worker 3<br/>Tests]
|
||||
OW1 & OW2 & OW3 --> OR([Results aggregated])
|
||||
end
|
||||
|
||||
subgraph PIPE["Pattern 2: Pipeline"]
|
||||
PA[Agent A\nRequirements] --> PB[Agent B\nImplementation]
|
||||
PB --> PC[Agent C\nReview]
|
||||
PA[Agent A<br/>Requirements] --> PB[Agent B<br/>Implementation]
|
||||
PB --> PC[Agent C<br/>Review]
|
||||
PC --> PD([Final output])
|
||||
end
|
||||
|
||||
subgraph ROUTE["Pattern 3: Specialist Router"]
|
||||
RR{Router Agent\nanalyzes task} --> RC[Code Agent]
|
||||
RR{Router Agent<br/>analyzes task} --> RC[Code Agent]
|
||||
RR --> RT[Test Agent]
|
||||
RR --> RD[Docs Agent]
|
||||
RC & RT & RD --> RO([Specialized result])
|
||||
|
|
@ -79,19 +79,19 @@ Git worktrees enable true parallel development: each Claude instance works in an
|
|||
|
||||
```mermaid
|
||||
flowchart LR
|
||||
MB[(Main Branch\ngit repository)] --> WA[git worktree add\nfeature-A]
|
||||
MB --> WB[git worktree add\nfeature-B]
|
||||
MB --> WC[git worktree add\nbugfix-C]
|
||||
MB[(Main Branch<br/>git repository)] --> WA[git worktree add<br/>feature-A]
|
||||
MB --> WB[git worktree add<br/>feature-B]
|
||||
MB --> WC[git worktree add<br/>bugfix-C]
|
||||
|
||||
WA --> CA[Claude Instance 1\n/worktrees/feature-A]
|
||||
WB --> CB[Claude Instance 2\n/worktrees/feature-B]
|
||||
WC --> CC[Claude Instance 3\n/worktrees/bugfix-C]
|
||||
WA --> CA[Claude Instance 1<br/>/worktrees/feature-A]
|
||||
WB --> CB[Claude Instance 2<br/>/worktrees/feature-B]
|
||||
WC --> CC[Claude Instance 3<br/>/worktrees/bugfix-C]
|
||||
|
||||
CA --> CA1([Commits to feature-A])
|
||||
CB --> CB1([Commits to feature-B])
|
||||
CC --> CC1([Commits to bugfix-C])
|
||||
|
||||
CA1 & CB1 & CC1 --> MERGE([Merge to main\nwhen ready])
|
||||
CA1 & CB1 & CC1 --> MERGE([Merge to main<br/>when ready])
|
||||
|
||||
style MB fill:#E87E2F,color:#fff
|
||||
style CA fill:#6DB3F2,color:#fff
|
||||
|
|
@ -132,22 +132,22 @@ Separating planning from execution using two Claude instances prevents costly mi
|
|||
```mermaid
|
||||
sequenceDiagram
|
||||
participant U as User
|
||||
participant PL as Planner Claude\n(no tools)
|
||||
participant EX as Executor Claude\n(full tools)
|
||||
participant PL as Planner Claude<br/>(no tools)
|
||||
participant EX as Executor Claude<br/>(full tools)
|
||||
|
||||
U->>PL: "Plan how to refactor auth module"
|
||||
Note over PL: Reads docs, analyzes requirements\nNo execution risk — no tools
|
||||
Note over PL: Reads docs, analyzes requirements<br/>No execution risk — no tools
|
||||
|
||||
PL->>U: Detailed plan:\n1. Files to change\n2. Order of operations\n3. Risk points\n4. Rollback strategy
|
||||
PL->>U: Detailed plan:<br/>1. Files to change<br/>2. Order of operations<br/>3. Risk points<br/>4. Rollback strategy
|
||||
|
||||
U->>U: Review plan carefully
|
||||
Note over U: Human checkpoint:\napprove or adjust
|
||||
Note over U: Human checkpoint:<br/>approve or adjust
|
||||
|
||||
U->>EX: "Execute this plan: [plan text]"
|
||||
EX->>EX: Implements step by step
|
||||
EX->>U: Progress updates + results
|
||||
|
||||
Note over PL,EX: Key insight: planner can be\nmore thorough without execution anxiety
|
||||
Note over PL,EX: Key insight: planner can be<br/>more thorough without execution anxiety
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
<details>
|
||||
|
|
@ -181,20 +181,20 @@ When tasks can be parallelized, spawn N Claude instances simultaneously instead
|
|||
|
||||
```mermaid
|
||||
flowchart LR
|
||||
BT([Large Task:\nRefactor 50 files]) --> DEC{Decompose\ninto N subtasks}
|
||||
BT([Large Task:<br/>Refactor 50 files]) --> DEC{Decompose<br/>into N subtasks}
|
||||
|
||||
DEC --> T1["Subtask 1\nFiles 1-10"]
|
||||
DEC --> T2["Subtask 2\nFiles 11-20"]
|
||||
DEC --> T3["Subtask 3\nFiles 21-30"]
|
||||
DEC --> TN["Subtask N\n..."]
|
||||
DEC --> T1["Subtask 1<br/>Files 1-10"]
|
||||
DEC --> T2["Subtask 2<br/>Files 11-20"]
|
||||
DEC --> T3["Subtask 3<br/>Files 21-30"]
|
||||
DEC --> TN["Subtask N<br/>..."]
|
||||
|
||||
T1 --> CI1[Claude\nInstance 1]
|
||||
T2 --> CI2[Claude\nInstance 2]
|
||||
T3 --> CI3[Claude\nInstance 3]
|
||||
TN --> CIN[Claude\nInstance N]
|
||||
T1 --> CI1[Claude<br/>Instance 1]
|
||||
T2 --> CI2[Claude<br/>Instance 2]
|
||||
T3 --> CI3[Claude<br/>Instance 3]
|
||||
TN --> CIN[Claude<br/>Instance N]
|
||||
|
||||
CI1 & CI2 & CI3 & CIN --> AGG(Aggregate\nresults)
|
||||
AGG --> REV([Integration review\n~10x faster than sequential])
|
||||
CI1 & CI2 & CI3 & CIN --> AGG(Aggregate<br/>results)
|
||||
AGG --> REV([Integration review<br/>~10x faster than sequential])
|
||||
|
||||
style BT fill:#F5E6D3,color:#333
|
||||
style DEC fill:#E87E2F,color:#fff
|
||||
|
|
@ -236,20 +236,20 @@ Not every task needs multiple instances. This decision tree guides you to the ri
|
|||
|
||||
```mermaid
|
||||
flowchart TD
|
||||
A([Task to complete]) --> B{Need multiple\nClaude instances?}
|
||||
B -->|No| C([Single session\nStandard usage])
|
||||
B -->|Yes| D{How many\ninstances?}
|
||||
A([Task to complete]) --> B{Need multiple<br/>Claude instances?}
|
||||
B -->|No| C([Single session<br/>Standard usage])
|
||||
B -->|Yes| D{How many<br/>instances?}
|
||||
|
||||
D -->|2-3| E{Need branch\nisolation?}
|
||||
E -->|Yes| F([Git worktrees\nSeparate branches])
|
||||
E -->|No| G([Multiple terminals\nSame repo])
|
||||
D -->|2-3| E{Need branch<br/>isolation?}
|
||||
E -->|Yes| F([Git worktrees<br/>Separate branches])
|
||||
E -->|No| G([Multiple terminals<br/>Same repo])
|
||||
|
||||
D -->|4+| H{Task structure?}
|
||||
H -->|Independent tasks| I([Task tool\nSub-agents in parallel])
|
||||
H -->|Sequential pipeline| J([Agent pipeline\nA → B → C])
|
||||
H -->|Mixed expertise| K([Specialist router\nRoute by task type])
|
||||
H -->|Independent tasks| I([Task tool<br/>Sub-agents in parallel])
|
||||
H -->|Sequential pipeline| J([Agent pipeline<br/>A → B → C])
|
||||
H -->|Mixed expertise| K([Specialist router<br/>Route by task type])
|
||||
|
||||
B2{Need planning\nseparation?} --> L([Dual-instance\nPlanner + Executor])
|
||||
B2{Need planning<br/>separation?} --> L([Dual-instance<br/>Planner + Executor])
|
||||
|
||||
style A fill:#F5E6D3,color:#333
|
||||
style B fill:#E87E2F,color:#fff
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue