docs: add Anaconda Croce evaluation (minimal integration)
Resource evaluated: "What I Learned Challenging Claude to a Coding Competition" by Steve Croce (Anaconda Field CTO, Jan 16, 2026) Score: 2/5 (Marginal - Info secondaire) Integration: - Added "Community Experiences" section in guide/learning-with-ai.md - 2-paragraph mention with strong caveats (N=1, non-representative context) - Full evaluation in docs/resource-evaluations/anaconda-croce-evaluation.md - Updated reference.yaml count (14 → 16 evaluations) Rationale: - Provides light empirical validation (90s vs 60min on Advent of Code) - Highlights "collaboration cost" angle (decreased Slack engagement) - Limitations prevent extensive integration (solo puzzles ≠ team dev) - Commercial bias noted (Anaconda blog by Anaconda CTO) Technical review challenged initial 4/5 score → adjusted to 2/5. Maintains guide rigor through minimal integration + explicit caveats. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
444ce5aa6a
commit
ab8bfcf782
3 changed files with 252 additions and 1 deletions
|
|
@ -232,10 +232,11 @@ deep_dive:
|
|||
gsd_note: "Overlap with existing patterns (Ralph Loop, Gas Town, BMAD)"
|
||||
# Resource Evaluations (added 2026-01-26)
|
||||
resource_evaluations_directory: "docs/resource-evaluations/"
|
||||
resource_evaluations_count: 14
|
||||
resource_evaluations_count: 16
|
||||
resource_evaluations_methodology: "docs/resource-evaluations/README.md"
|
||||
resource_evaluations_appendix: "guide/ultimate-guide.md:15034"
|
||||
resource_evaluations_readme_section: "README.md:278"
|
||||
resource_evaluations_anaconda_croce: "docs/resource-evaluations/anaconda-croce-evaluation.md"
|
||||
# Practitioner Insights (external validation)
|
||||
practitioner_insights: "guide/ai-ecosystem.md:1209"
|
||||
practitioner_dave_van_veen: "guide/ai-ecosystem.md:1213"
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue