Florian BRUNIAUX
|
fdee3305c5
|
docs: RTK documentation update - upstream + fork integration
- Update guide/ultimate-guide.md: RTK section (l.11084-11174)
- Two repositories: upstream (stable) + fork (extended features)
- Fork features: vitest, pnpm, prisma, gain, discover
- Bug fixes documented (grep/ls fixed in fork)
- Installation options: cargo, fork, binary
- Add guide/third-party-tools.md: RTK card (l.86)
- Comparison upstream vs fork
- Token savings: 70-90% depending on stack
- Cross-reference to ultimate-guide Section 9
- Update machine-readable/reference.yaml:
- rtk_upstream + rtk_fork_extended (two repos)
- third_party_tools_rtk entry added
- Line numbers updated
- Update docs/resource-evaluations/rtk-evaluation.md:
- UPDATE 2026-02-01 section with fork comparison
- Fork features table (JS/TS stack support)
- Installation instructions for fork
Total: 4 files, ~320 lines modified
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
2026-02-01 22:20:43 +01:00 |
|
Florian BRUNIAUX
|
c28161dca8
|
docs: enrich RTK evaluation with T3 Stack production testing
Real-World Testing Results (Méthode Aristote - T3 Stack):
- Project: Next.js 15 + tRPC + Prisma + pnpm
- Commands tested: 12 (git, pnpm, Vitest, TypeScript, Prisma)
- Git workflows validated: 85.6% avg reduction (up from 72.6%)
Critical Bug Discovered:
- git argument parsing broken (`--oneline`, `--graph` blocked)
- Workaround: `rtk git log -- -20` (works)
- Impact: CRITICAL - affects ALL git users
Modern Stack Gaps Identified:
- pnpm support MISSING (80-90% reduction possible, CRITICAL impact)
- Vitest support MISSING (90% reduction possible, HIGH impact)
- TypeScript support MISSING (70% reduction possible, MEDIUM impact)
ROI Analysis:
- Current v0.2.0: 40% command coverage, 55% token reduction
- Proposed v0.3.0 (pnpm + Vitest): 85% coverage, 80% reduction
- Dev effort: 1 week (7 days)
New Deliverables:
- Benchmark script: examples/scripts/rtk-benchmark.sh (reproductible tests)
- Test results: claudedocs/rtk-test-results-aristote.md (53KB, gitignored)
- Updated PR proposals: claudedocs/rtk-pr-proposals.md (P0-P2 ranking)
- GitHub issues: claudedocs/rtk-github-issue-template.md (ready for upstream)
Updated Evaluation:
- Score: Still 4/5 (GOOD) but clearer path to 5/5 (CRITICAL)
- Blockers: git args bug + pnpm/Vitest gaps
- Strength: 85.6% git reduction validated on production codebase
Full report: claudedocs/rtk-test-results-aristote.md (23K detailed analysis)
|
2026-01-28 14:01:37 +01:00 |
|
Florian BRUNIAUX
|
1000cb6e85
|
docs: add RTK integration templates and evaluation
- Evaluation: docs/resource-evaluations/rtk-evaluation.md (4/5 score, comprehensive benchmarks)
- CLAUDE.md template: examples/claude-md/rtk-optimized.md (manual usage instructions)
- Skill template: examples/skills/rtk-optimizer/SKILL.md (auto-suggestion)
- Hook template: examples/hooks/bash/rtk-auto-wrapper.sh (PreToolUse auto-wrapper)
- PR proposals: claudedocs/rtk-pr-proposals.md (7 upstream improvements)
These templates enable 3 RTK integration strategies referenced in guide:10478
|
2026-01-28 13:03:10 +01:00 |
|