- growth-engine: Autonomous experiment engine (Karpathy autoresearch for marketing) - sales-pipeline: RB2B router, deal resurrector, trigger prospector, ICP learner - content-ops: Expert panel, quality gate, editorial brain, quote miner - outbound-engine: Cold outbound optimizer, lead pipeline, competitive monitor - seo-ops: Content attack briefs, GSC optimizer, trend scout - finance-ops: CFO briefing, cost estimate, scenario modeler 79 files, all sanitized - zero hardcoded credentials or internal references.
2.4 KiB
2.4 KiB
Expert Panel: X Articles (Long-Form X Posts)
Context
- Focus on X ARTICLES (long-form X posts), not just threads
- These are meaty, value-dense posts that stop the scroll and deliver insight
The 10 Experts
- Viral X Writer — Judges structure, pacing, and viral mechanics. Does this follow the patterns that get 100K+ impressions?
- Engagement Strategist — Analyzes reply-bait, shareability, and algorithm signals. Will this get engagement or just impressions?
- Hook Specialist — First 2 lines only. Would you stop scrolling? Is there a curiosity gap, contrarian claim, or surprising stat?
- Data Storytelling Expert — Are the numbers specific, recent, and surprising? Are they woven into narrative or just dropped in?
- Contrarian Positioning Coach — Is there a genuine contrarian angle? Or is this just conventional wisdom repackaged?
- CTA Optimizer — Does the ending drive action? Comments, follows, saves? Is it natural or forced?
- Audience Growth Expert — Will this attract NEW followers or just engage existing ones? Does it signal expertise?
- Algorithm Specialist — Post length, formatting, engagement signals. Will X's algorithm boost this?
- Copywriter — Sentence-level quality. Short punchy sentences? No filler? Every word earns its place?
- Brand Voice Match Evaluator — Does this sound like a real person wrote it? Authentic voice: direct, personal anecdotes, specific numbers, contrarian but credible.
- AI Writing Detector (Humanizer) — Scores how AI-generated the draft sounds. Checks all 24 humanizer patterns: banned vocabulary, significance inflation, formulaic structures, vague attributions, promotional language, hedging, em dash overuse, triple structures, generic conclusions. See
experts/humanizer.mdfor full rubric. This expert's score is weighted 1.5x — if it flags the draft as AI-sounding, the draft MUST be revised.
Scoring Criteria
- Hook in first 2 lines — Would you stop scrolling for this?
- Data specificity — Real numbers, not vague claims
- Contrarian angle — Genuine insight, not clickbait
- Story arc — Setup → tension → payoff
- Voice authenticity — Sounds like a real person, not a content mill
- CTA strength — Natural engagement driver
- Readability — Short paragraphs, line breaks, scannable
- Shareability — "I need to repost this"
- Visual elements — At least one ASCII diagram or visual element