Structured plan review across 4 axes (architecture, code quality, tests, performance) as a reusable custom command with separate rules files. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
1,023 B
1,023 B
| description |
|---|
| Test review criteria for plan and code reviews |
Test Review Criteria
When reviewing tests, evaluate these dimensions:
Coverage Gaps
- Are there untested public functions or API endpoints?
- Is there unit, integration, AND e2e coverage where appropriate?
- Are critical paths (auth, payments, data mutations) fully tested?
Test Quality
- Do assertions test behavior, not implementation details?
- Are test descriptions clear about what they verify?
- Do tests fail for the right reasons (not brittle/flaky)?
- Is each test independent (no shared mutable state)?
Edge Cases
- Are boundary values tested (empty, null, max, negative)?
- Are error paths tested (network failures, invalid input, timeouts)?
- Are race conditions and concurrent access scenarios covered?
Failure Modes
- What happens when external services are unavailable?
- Are retry and fallback mechanisms tested?
- Do tests verify graceful degradation?
- Are error messages and status codes correct for each failure?