Hullo @FlorianBruniaux 👋 I ran your skills through `tessl skill review` at work and found some targeted improvements. Here's the full before/after: | Skill | Before | After | Change | |-------|--------|-------|--------| | talk-pipeline/orchestrator | 0% | 93% | +93% | | talk-pipeline/stage-3-concepts | 0% | 93% | +93% | | talk-pipeline/stage-4-position | 0% | 93% | +93% | | talk-pipeline/stage-1-extract | 0% | 85% | +85% | | talk-pipeline/stage-2-research | 0% | 85% | +85% | | talk-pipeline/stage-5-script | 0% | 85% | +85% | | talk-pipeline/stage-6-revision | 0% | 79% | +79% | | ccboard | 32% | 100% | +68% | | audit-agents-skills | 34% | 95% | +61% | | rtk-optimizer | 41% | 100% | +59% | | skill-creator | 52% | 89% | +37% | | voice-refine | 59% | 93% | +34% | | design-patterns | 59% | 85% | +26% | | cyber-defense-team | 76% | 100% | +24% | | landing-page-generator | 70% | 93% | +23% | | issue-triage | 73% | 89% | +16% | | pr-triage | 73% | 89% | +16% | | release-notes-generator | 78% | 85% | +7% | | guide-recap | 93% | 100% | +7% | **Average: 11% → 91% (+80%)** <details> <summary>Changes summary</summary> ### All 7 talk-pipeline skills (0% → 79-93%) - **Fixed `allowed-tools` frontmatter**: Changed from YAML list syntax (which fails validation) to comma-separated string format - **Improved descriptions**: Added specific actions and "Use when..." clauses to all pipeline stage descriptions ### ccboard (32% → 100%) - Rewrote description with concrete actions and "Use when..." clause - Removed ~80% bloat: architecture, credits, license, contributing, performance, limitations, roadmap sections - Kept commands table, navigation shortcuts, 3 usage examples, and troubleshooting - Added validation section ### audit-agents-skills (34% → 95%) - Rewrote description with concrete trigger terms and "Use when..." clause - Removed Industry Context section, verbose Purpose section, detection patterns, full JSON output example - Added validation checkpoints between workflow phases - Condensed scoring criteria tables ### rtk-optimizer (41% → 100%) - Rewrote description with natural user terms instead of jargon - Consolidated redundant metrics into single unified table - Removed redundant Configuration and Limitations sections - Added error handling and prerequisites sections ### skill-creator (52% → 89%) - Rewrote description with concrete actions and "Use when..." clause - Removed verbose explanatory sections Claude already understands - Restructured into clear 4-step workflow (Create → Template → Validate → Package) - Added explicit validation step ### voice-refine (59% → 93%) - Added "Use when..." clause with natural terms (voice memo, dictation, speech-to-text) - Removed Integration with Voice Tools section (Wispr Flow hotkeys irrelevant to Claude) - Condensed What Gets Removed/Preserved into concise Filtering Rules section ### design-patterns (59% → 85%) - Added "Use when..." clause with trigger terms (refactoring, singleton, factory, observer) - Reduced invocation examples from 9 to 4 - Removed redundant Suggestion Mode output example (~80 lines) ### cyber-defense-team (76% → 100%) - Added "Use when..." clause with natural security terms - Replaced prose descriptions with concrete Agent tool call syntax ### landing-page-generator (70% → 93%) - Added natural trigger terms (homepage, project website, marketing page) - Added Step 5: Validation Checkpoint - Removed redundant Related Use Cases section ### issue-triage (73% → 89%) - Converted `>` block scalar description to quoted string with "Use when..." clause - Condensed Jaccard algorithm pseudocode into concise paragraphs - Converted edge cases from 10-row table to 8 bullet points ### pr-triage (73% → 89%) - Converted `>` block scalar description to quoted string with "Use when..." clause - Removed unnecessary inline bash comments - Consolidated rate limiting notes ### release-notes-generator (78% → 85%) - Added natural trigger terms (release, changelog, version notes, ship) - Merged "When to Use" and "What This Skill Does" into single Workflow section ### guide-recap (93% → 100%) - Added trigger terms (release notes, announcements, social media posts) - Wrapped description in quotes </details> Honest disclosure — I work at @tesslio where we build tooling around skills like these. Not a pitch - just saw room for improvement and wanted to contribute. Want to self-improve your skills? Just point your agent (Claude Code, Codex, etc.) at [this Tessl guide](https://docs.tessl.io/evaluate/optimize-a-skill-using-best-practices) and ask it to optimize your skill. Ping me - [@popey](https://github.com/popey) - if you hit any snags. Thanks in advance 🙏
14 KiB
| name | description | allowed-tools | context | agent |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| design-patterns | Detect, suggest, and evaluate GoF design patterns in TypeScript/JavaScript codebases. Use when refactoring code, applying singleton/factory/observer/strategy patterns, reviewing pattern quality, or finding stack-native alternatives for React, Angular, NestJS, and Vue. | Read, Grep, Glob, mcp__grepai__grepai_search | fork | specialist |
Design Patterns Analyzer Skill
Purpose: Detect, suggest, and evaluate Gang of Four (GoF) design patterns in TypeScript/JavaScript codebases with stack-aware adaptations.
Core Capabilities
- Stack Detection: Identify primary framework/library (React, Angular, NestJS, Vue, Express, RxJS, Redux, ORMs)
- Pattern Detection: Find existing implementations of 23 GoF patterns
- Smart Suggestions: Recommend patterns to fix code smells, using stack-native idioms when available
- Quality Evaluation: Assess pattern implementation quality against best practices
Operating Modes
Mode 1: Detection
Trigger: User requests pattern detection or analysis Output: JSON report of patterns found with confidence scores and stack context
Workflow:
1. Stack Detection (package.json, tsconfig.json, framework files)
2. Pattern Search (Glob for candidates → Grep for signatures → Read for validation)
3. Classification (native to stack vs custom implementations)
4. Confidence Scoring (0.0-1.0 based on detection rules)
5. JSON Report Generation
Example: /design-patterns detect src/
Mode 2: Suggestion
Trigger: User requests pattern suggestions or refactoring advice Output: Markdown report with prioritized suggestions and stack-adapted examples
Workflow:
1. Code Smell Detection (switch statements, long parameter lists, global state, etc.)
2. Pattern Matching (map smell → applicable patterns)
3. Stack Adaptation (prefer native framework patterns over custom implementations)
4. Priority Ranking (impact × feasibility)
5. Markdown Report with Code Examples
Example: /design-patterns suggest src/payment/
Mode 3: Evaluation
Trigger: User requests pattern quality assessment Output: JSON report with scores per evaluation criterion
Workflow:
1. Pattern Identification (which pattern is implemented)
2. Criteria Assessment (correctness, testability, SOLID compliance, documentation)
3. Issue Detection (common mistakes, anti-patterns)
4. Scoring (0-10 per criterion)
5. JSON Report with Recommendations
Example: /design-patterns evaluate src/services/singleton.ts
Methodology
Phase 1: Stack Detection
Sources (in priority order):
package.json→ Check dependencies and devDependencies- Framework-specific files →
angular.json,next.config.*,nest-cli.json,vite.config.* tsconfig.json→ Check compilerOptions, paths, lib- File extensions →
*.jsx,*.tsx,*.vuepresence
Detection Rules (from signatures/stack-patterns.yaml):
- React:
reactin deps +*.jsx/*.tsxfiles - Angular:
@angular/core+angular.json - NestJS:
@nestjs/core+nest-cli.json - Vue:
vuev3+ +*.vuefiles - Express:
expressin deps +app.usepatterns - RxJS:
rxjsin deps + Observable usage - Redux/Zustand:
redux/zustandin deps + store patterns - Prisma/TypeORM:
prisma/typeormin deps + schema files
Output:
{
"stack_detected": {
"primary": "react",
"version": "18.2.0",
"secondary": ["typescript", "zustand", "prisma"],
"detection_sources": ["package.json", "tsconfig.json", "37 *.tsx files"],
"confidence": 0.95
}
}
Phase 2: Pattern Detection
Search Strategy:
-
Glob Phase: Find candidate files by naming convention
*Singleton*.ts,*Factory*.ts,*Strategy*.ts,*Observer*.ts, etc.*Manager*.ts,*Builder*.ts,*Adapter*.ts,*Proxy*.ts, etc.
-
Grep Phase: Search for pattern signatures (from
signatures/detection-rules.yaml)- Primary signals:
private constructor,static getInstance(),subscribe(),createXxx(), etc. - Secondary signals: Interface naming, delegation patterns, method signatures
- Primary signals:
-
Read Phase: Validate pattern structure
- Parse class/interface definitions
- Verify relationships (inheritance, composition, delegation)
- Check for complete pattern implementation vs partial usage
Confidence Scoring:
- 0.9-1.0: All primary + secondary signals present, structure matches exactly
- 0.7-0.89: All primary signals + some secondary, minor deviations
- 0.5-0.69: Primary signals present, missing secondary validation
- 0.3-0.49: Naming convention matches, weak structural evidence
- 0.0-0.29: Insufficient evidence, likely false positive
Classification:
native: Pattern implemented using stack-native features (React Context, Angular Services, NestJS Guards, etc.)custom: Manual TypeScript implementationlibrary: Third-party library providing pattern (RxJS Subject, Redux Store, etc.)
Phase 3: Code Smell Detection
Target Smells (from signatures/code-smells.yaml):
- Switch on Type → Strategy/Factory pattern
- Long Parameter List (>4) → Builder pattern
- Global State Access → Singleton (or preferably DI)
- Duplicated Conditionals on State → State pattern
- Scattered Notification Logic → Observer pattern
- Complex Object Creation → Factory/Abstract Factory
- Tight Coupling to Concrete Classes → Adapter/Bridge
- Repetitive Interface Conversions → Adapter pattern
- Deep Nesting for Feature Addition → Decorator pattern
- Large Class with Many Responsibilities → Facade pattern
Detection Heuristics:
- Grep for
switch (.*type),switch (.*kind),switch (.*mode) - Count function parameters:
function \w+\([^)]{60,}\)(approximation for >4 params) - Search for global access:
window\.,global\.,process\.env\.\w+(not in config files) - Find state conditionals:
if.*state.*===.*&&.*if.*state.*=== - Find notification patterns:
forEach.*notify,map.*\.emit\(
Phase 4: Stack-Aware Suggestions
Adaptation Logic (from signatures/stack-patterns.yaml):
IF pattern_detected == "custom" AND stack_has_native_equivalent:
SUGGEST: "Use stack-native pattern instead"
PROVIDE: Side-by-side comparison (current vs recommended)
ELSE IF code_smell_detected AND pattern_missing:
IF stack_provides_pattern:
SUGGEST: Stack-native implementation with examples
ELSE:
SUGGEST: Custom TypeScript implementation with best practices
ELSE IF pattern_implemented_incorrectly:
PROVIDE: Refactoring steps to fix anti-patterns
Example Adaptations:
| Pattern | Stack | Native Alternative | Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Singleton | React | Context API + Provider | Use createContext() instead of getInstance() |
| Observer | Angular | RxJS Subject/BehaviorSubject | Use built-in Observables, not custom implementation |
| Decorator | NestJS | @Injectable() decorators + Interceptors | Use framework interceptors |
| Strategy | Vue 3 | Composition API composables | Use ref() + composables instead of classes |
| Chain of Responsibility | Express | Middleware (app.use()) |
Use Express middleware chain |
| Command | Redux | Action creators + reducers | Use Redux actions, not custom command objects |
Phase 5: Quality Evaluation
Criteria (from checklists/pattern-evaluation.md):
- Correctness (0-10): Does it match the canonical pattern structure?
- Testability (0-10): Can dependencies be mocked/stubbed easily?
- Single Responsibility (0-10): Does it do one thing only?
- Open/Closed Principle (0-10): Extensible without modification?
- Documentation (0-10): Clear intent, descriptive naming?
Scoring Guidelines:
- 9-10: Exemplary, reference-quality implementation
- 7-8: Good, minor improvements possible
- 5-6: Acceptable, notable issues to address
- 3-4: Problematic, significant refactoring needed
- 0-2: Incorrect or severely flawed
Issue Detection:
- Hard-coded dependencies (Singleton with new inside getInstance)
- God classes (too many responsibilities)
- Leaky abstractions (exposing internal structure)
- Missing error handling
- Poor naming (Strategy1, Strategy2 instead of descriptive names)
Output Formats
Detection Mode (JSON)
{
"metadata": {
"scan_date": "2026-01-21T10:30:00Z",
"scope": "src/",
"files_scanned": 147,
"execution_time_ms": 2341
},
"stack_detected": {
"primary": "react",
"version": "18.2.0",
"secondary": ["typescript", "zustand", "prisma"],
"detection_sources": ["package.json", "tsconfig.json", "37 *.tsx files"],
"confidence": 0.95
},
"patterns_found": {
"singleton": [
{
"file": "src/lib/api-client.ts",
"lines": "5-28",
"confidence": 0.85,
"type": "custom",
"signals": ["private constructor", "static getInstance", "private static instance"],
"note": "Consider using React Context instead for better testability"
}
],
"observer": [
{
"file": "src/hooks/useAuth.ts",
"lines": "12-45",
"confidence": 0.92,
"type": "native",
"implementation": "React useState + useEffect",
"note": "Correctly using React's built-in observer pattern"
}
],
"factory": [
{
"file": "src/services/notification-factory.ts",
"lines": "8-67",
"confidence": 0.78,
"type": "custom",
"signals": ["createNotification method", "type discrimination", "returns interface"]
}
]
},
"summary": {
"total_patterns": 7,
"native_to_stack": 4,
"custom_implementations": 3,
"by_category": {
"creational": 2,
"structural": 3,
"behavioral": 2
},
"by_confidence": {
"high": 5,
"medium": 2,
"low": 0
}
},
"recommendations": [
"Consider replacing custom Singleton (api-client.ts) with React Context for better DI",
"Review Factory pattern (notification-factory.ts) - could be simplified with strategy pattern"
]
}
Evaluation Mode (JSON)
{
"file": "src/services/config-singleton.ts",
"pattern": "singleton",
"lines": "5-34",
"scores": {
"correctness": 8,
"testability": 4,
"single_responsibility": 9,
"open_closed": 7,
"documentation": 6,
"overall": 6.8
},
"details": {
"correctness": {
"score": 8,
"rationale": "Implements singleton structure correctly with private constructor and static getInstance",
"issues": ["Missing thread-safety consideration (not critical in JS single-threaded context)"]
},
"testability": {
"score": 4,
"rationale": "Hard to mock or reset instance in tests",
"issues": [
"No reset method for test isolation",
"Static instance makes dependency injection impossible",
"Tests must run in specific order or share state"
],
"suggestions": [
"Add resetInstance() method for tests (with appropriate guards)",
"Consider using dependency injection instead"
]
},
"single_responsibility": {
"score": 9,
"rationale": "Focuses solely on configuration management",
"issues": []
},
"open_closed": {
"score": 7,
"rationale": "Configuration can be extended but requires modification for new sources",
"suggestions": ["Consider strategy pattern for configuration sources"]
},
"documentation": {
"score": 6,
"rationale": "Has JSDoc but missing rationale for singleton choice",
"suggestions": ["Document why singleton is chosen over DI", "Add usage examples"]
}
},
"recommendations": [
{
"priority": "high",
"suggestion": "Add test-friendly reset mechanism or refactor to use DI",
"rationale": "Current implementation makes testing difficult"
},
{
"priority": "medium",
"suggestion": "Document singleton rationale in JSDoc",
"rationale": "Team members should understand why global state is necessary here"
}
]
}
Constraints & Guidelines
Read-Only Analysis
- No modifications: This skill only analyzes and suggests, never modifies code
- No file creation: Does not generate refactored code files
- User decision: All suggestions require explicit user approval before implementation
Language Focus
- Primary: TypeScript (
.ts,.tsx) - Secondary: JavaScript (
.js,.jsx) - Exclusions: Other languages (Python, Java, C#) not supported
Pattern Coverage
- Creational (5): Singleton, Factory Method, Abstract Factory, Builder, Prototype
- Structural (7): Adapter, Bridge, Composite, Decorator, Facade, Flyweight, Proxy
- Behavioral (11): Chain of Responsibility, Command, Iterator, Mediator, Memento, Observer, State, Strategy, Template Method, Visitor, Interpreter
Performance Considerations
- Large codebases (>500 files): Use
--scopeto limit scan to specific directories - Parallel search: Grep searches run independently for each pattern
- Caching: Stack detection results cached per session to avoid redundant package.json reads
Usage Examples
/design-patterns detect src/ # Detect all patterns
/design-patterns detect src/ --category=creational # Creational only
/design-patterns suggest src/payment/ # Suggestions for module
/design-patterns evaluate src/services/api-client.ts # Evaluate specific file
Integration with Other Skills
This skill can be inherited by:
refactoring-specialist.md→ Provides pattern knowledge for refactoringcode-reviewer.md→ Adds pattern detection to review processarchitecture-advisor.md→ Informs architectural decisions with pattern usage
Reference Files
reference/patterns-index.yaml→ Machine-readable index of 23 patterns with metadatareference/creational.md→ Creational patterns documentationreference/structural.md→ Structural patterns documentationreference/behavioral.md→ Behavioral patterns documentationsignatures/detection-rules.yaml→ Regex patterns and heuristics for detectionsignatures/code-smells.yaml→ Mapping from code smells to applicable patternssignatures/stack-patterns.yaml→ Stack detection rules and native pattern equivalentschecklists/pattern-evaluation.md→ Quality evaluation criteria and scoring guidelines
Version
Skill Version: 1.0.0 Pattern Coverage: 23 GoF patterns Supported Stacks: 8 (React, Angular, NestJS, Vue, Express, RxJS, Redux/Zustand, ORMs) Last Updated: 2026-01-21